Author: Supriya Jena

Several senior Russian missile experts have traveled to Iran in the past year as both countries strengthen their defense ties. Travel records show that seven Russian specialists flew from Moscow to Tehran on two occasions last year: April 24 and September 17.

Out of these seven experts, six were on official state business, indicated by their special passport numbers. All seven have high-ranking positions in the military. Two are colonels, two are lieutenant-colonels, and others are experts in air defense, artillery, and weapon development.

An Iranian defense official stated that Russian experts visited Iranian missile production facilities, including some in underground locations. Although it’s unclear exactly what they were doing, these visits occurred during a tense period for Iran, which was engaged in military exchanges with Israel.

Attempts to contact the Russian specialists were met with varied responses. Five of them denied visiting Iran or their military roles, while one did not comment, and another hung up.

Both Iran and Russia signed a significant military agreement last January. Their cooperation has already affected Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine, notably with the deployment of Iranian-designed drones.

The information about these flights was provided to Reuters by a group of Iranian hackers opposing the government. They mentioned that the Russian experts traveled as VIPs.

The names, ranks, and backgrounds of these men show their capabilities in various military operations, from missile defense systems to advanced weapons research. One expert on the September flight was Sergei Yurchenko, who has also worked for the Russian military.

This collaboration between Russia and Iran highlights the ongoing military developments between the two nations amid rising tensions in the region.

Decatur, Georgia — At Beacon Hill Middle School in Decatur, Georgia, cameras watch for speeding cars in the school zone. Supporters believe these cameras help slow down drivers and make the area safer, especially when police can’t always be there. However, some lawmakers want to ban these cameras, claiming they mainly exist to collect money for local governments and camera companies.

More than 20 states, plus Washington D.C., use automated traffic cameras for speeding tickets, but over ten states have banned them. New Jersey tried using them for red-light violations but stopped in 2014. In Georgia, the debate about traffic cameras is heating up with three bills moving forward in the state legislature. The use of speed cameras in school zones was allowed in Georgia starting in 2018.

Opponents Say Cameras Only Care About Money
Over 100 representatives in Georgia’s House of 180 have backed House Bill 225 to ban speed cameras. Dale Washburn, a Republican from Macon, shared emails from drivers who felt unfairly ticketed. Some claimed they didn’t know they were in a school zone or that the warning lights weren’t flashing. Although tickets are considered civil fines and don’t show up on criminal records, drivers can’t renew their vehicle registration if they don’t pay. In 2024, about 125,000 people had unpaid violations, according to the Georgia Department of Revenue. Since 2019, speed cameras have made more than $112 million for cities and counties in Georgia, with a portion going to camera companies. Washburn criticized these companies, saying, “Their goal is to write tickets, not to enhance children’s safety.”

Political Influence and Potential Reforms
Some lawmakers are considering stricter rules for camera use instead of banning them. They want better warning signs and to limit when the cameras operate. Republican Senator Max Burns of Sylvania sponsors Senate Bill 75, suggesting it would help remind drivers they are in a school zone. An alternate House bill suggests using half of the money from tickets for school safety.

In Decatur, many students walk or ride bikes home. Mayor Patti Garrett stressed the importance of protecting young residents after incidents where students were hit by cars. Police Chief Scott Richards said speeding has dropped by 92% in areas where cameras are used, but many drivers still speed. The city issued 4,500 tickets in January alone. With better warning signs and limited camera hours, Decatur claims its approach is effective. Nonetheless, some residents worry about the profit aspect of ticketing. John Moore from Milledgeville wrote to Washburn, saying, “Profit-based law enforcement cannot be trusted.

European leaders are planning to visit Vietnam soon to strengthen their relationship with the country. This is happening because there are tensions with the United States that might hurt Vietnam’s exports. Former U.S. President Joe Biden tried to improve ties with Vietnam, seeing it as an important ally against China. But now, if Donald Trump becomes president again, he might impose taxes on Vietnam’s goods, which could hurt trade.

Because of this uncertainty, European countries are stepping up their connections with Vietnam. Ursula von der Leyen, the head of the European Commission, and French President Emmanuel Macron are both expected to visit Vietnam in the next few months. These trips were planned a while ago and are not yet confirmed.

Von der Leyen recently spoke with ASEAN leaders in Vietnam, mentioning that rising tariffs and export controls are concerning, and she wants to create new trade partnerships. Macron is expected to visit later in May to further strengthen ties with Vietnam, which was once a French colony. There are plans for EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic to go to Vietnam in April.

Last year, the EU imported $52 billion worth of goods from Vietnam, making it the third-largest market for Vietnamese exports, following the U.S. U.S. companies in Vietnam, which depend heavily on sales to the U.S., are worried they might have to cut jobs if new tariffs are imposed.

Interestingly, if this happens, it might lead to more Vietnamese goods being sold to the EU, and European companies might invest in Vietnam. This could be good for the country as it wants to improve its military supplies and infrastructure, including new railways.

Additionally, Europe is trying to fill the gap left by the U.S. in foreign aid after Trump cut it off. Belgium is starting a fund to help clean areas contaminated during the Vietnam War by agents like Agent Orange. The goal is to turn these areas into productive industrial zones.

Federal workers have until midnight to listen to Elon Musk’s second request for reports about what they’ve done recently. Musk, along with former President Trump, warned that those who don’t follow these instructions might get fired. They believe asking for a list of five accomplishments from last week will help make the government more accountable.

Many employees feel stressed and confused about this new rule as the government changes. Some agencies are telling their staff not to respond or to keep their answers limited, like they did last month when Musk made his first request.

This time, employees should expect to send their lists every Monday. There are about 2.4 million federal workers, with most not based in Washington, D.C. For example, workers at the Food and Drug Administration received several emails about the request on Monday, telling them about the new requirement and how to respond properly.

They must avoid sharing sensitive information and should answer with general statements only. Similar rules came from the Department of Energy. Employees were told not to include anything sensitive or classified and to keep things vague. The State Department said they would answer on behalf of their workers, while the Federal Bureau of Prisons allowed workers to say that their duties are security-sensitive. The Justice Department initially said not to respond due to confidentiality, but later changed its mind.

The FBI was also told to wait and not respond until told otherwise. Last month, the request for five accomplishments was optional, even with Musk hinting at layoffs. Now, individual agencies are asking, as they have the authority to hire or fire employees.

Musk described this new requirement as a “pulse check” to see if employees could report back effectively.