Debate: Should Chief Justice Be Involved in Executive Appointments

Legal experts debate if the Chief Justice of India should join executive appointments, like the CBI director. Opinions vary on fairness and democracy.

should cji be involved in top govt job appointments vp dhankhars comment divides opinions

On Saturday, legal experts shared different opinions about whether the Chief Justice of India (CJI) should be included in choosing executive leaders, like the CBI director. Some believe having the CJI involved brings fairness, while others think he should not be part of such decisions.

The discussion started when Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar questioned how it was right for the CJI to be part of these selections. He suggested it might be time to change the related rules.

Expert Rakesh Dwivedi argued that the CJI shouldn’t be in the selection committee for positions like the CBI director. On the other hand, lawyer Shoeb Alam said the CJI’s involvement can make these appointments fairer and more credible. He pointed out that a democracy benefits when the CJI is included, especially when there aren’t clear laws guiding such appointments.

Gopal Sankaranarayanan noted that since the case about the chief election commissioner’s appointment is currently reviewed by the Supreme Court, the Vice President shouldn’t have commented on it. Mohit Mathur added that since important roles like the prime minister and CJI are involved in choosing the CBI director, they shouldn’t face criticism for their roles.

During a meeting in Bhopal, the Vice President also shared his personal views, stating that having the CJI involved in selecting positions like the CBI director seems questionable. The Supreme Court is set to hear related cases on February 19 regarding the selection of election commissioners.

Comments

Leave a Reply