The leader of the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), Gavin Robinson, has made it clear that the upcoming review of the Windsor Framework should be a genuine assessment, not just a way to hide problems. This week, the UK Government announced that Lord Murphy, a former Northern Ireland and Welsh secretary, will lead this review.
This decision comes after the Stormont Assembly voted to extend post-Brexit trading rules in Northern Ireland for another four years. Lord Murphy has promised to listen to people’s problems with these trading arrangements. However, Robinson stressed that there should be more urgency in addressing unionist concerns.
The debate and vote in December were important because they allowed local leaders to have a say on trade rules affecting Northern Ireland. The Windsor Framework, which replaced the Northern Ireland Protocol, requires checks and paperwork for goods coming from Great Britain into Northern Ireland. This has created a lot of controversy, as many unionists believe it threatens Northern Ireland’s status in the UK.
The recent vote didn’t need support from both communities to pass, which means the UK Government now has to start the independent review. Lord Murphy will report back in six months. Robinson sees this as a chance to highlight the harm caused to Northern Ireland and is concerned that the recent Assembly vote ignored the principle of sharing power across communities.
He pointed out that the Windsor Framework and the last government’s plans didn’t achieve all their goals or fix many of the problems from the previous protocol. Therefore, the DUP will continue its push to fully restore Northern Ireland’s position in the UK, including ending the influence of EU laws that create barriers between Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Robinson also mentioned ongoing issues where rising costs for manufacturers and extra paperwork are making it hard for businesses in Great Britain to sell to Northern Ireland.
Lord Murphy, when speaking on a BBC show, expressed hope that his findings would get support from all parties. He acknowledged that a review was necessary precisely because there wasn’t cross-community support in the recent vote.
Leave a Reply